I was reading AC Grayling’s ‘The Meaning of Things’ last night, about fidelity. He raised the same question I have pondered over many times: can and/or should fidelity be compelled? Or, rather, he didn’t express it as a question, he was unequivocal that it has to be ‘freely given, not demanded as a right by the other party’.
That could sound like special pleading, and does make you wonder about his personal life (I have no idea. I have a feeling he’s gay, not that that would make any difference, and I’m probably completely wrong anyway).
Anyway, Hubby has never demanded fidelity as a right, he’s just had it by default as my efforts at infidelity always come to nothing.
Could there ever be a man who would mean so much to me that I would know unequivocally that I didn’t want anyone else? I’d like to think so, but I’ve never met him and I don’t suppose I ever shall now. I might believe it in the throes of infatuation, but long term? Well, it’s all moot.
I still have this yearning to find a soul mate, someone who will mean everything to me, but I know that's not Hubby, and I don’t see how it can ever happen with anyone else. La Spice says I’ll never find someone while I stay where I am. That’s the problem, it’s the safety net, I don’t want to let go, I don’t want to make that leap into the dark, to let go of the ladder, oh what a mess of mixed metaphors
. I'm like it with work too, other opportunites are coming up now, but I don't feel I can let go of the PC work, so I'm hanging on to it and taking on other stuff too which is why I'm so over-committed and stressed.
Maybe I’m too needy, too desperate for something else. Is that what drives them away?













2008-05-02 @ 19:37